The Truth About Indicators
What Indicators Actually Are
The mathematical reality:
Indicators are mathematical calculations based on past price data.
That’s it. Nothing magical. Just math.
Example:
Moving Average (20-period):
= Average of last 20 closing prices
= (Close1 + Close2 + ... + Close20) / 20
That's the entire "secret"
All indicators:
- Use past price data
- Apply mathematical formula
- Display result visually
- Lag behind current price (because they use past data)
The Fundamental Problem with Indicators
Indicators are LAGGING by nature.
They tell you what already happened, not what will happen.
Example visualization:
Price action:
├──────────┐ (Price turning down NOW)
│ │
│ └────── (Indicator still showing up trend)
│ (Because it's averaging past data)
└────────────────
By the time indicator confirms,
price already moved 20-30 pips
This is why:
- Indicators can’t predict future
- They confirm what price already showed
- Early signals = more false signals
- Late signals = missed entry opportunities
So Why Use Indicators At All?
If they lag and can’t predict, why bother?
Good question. Here’s why indicators CAN be useful:
1. Objective Confirmation
Price at support + Your eyes: "Looks like support holding"
Price at support + RSI oversold: "Objectively confirmed oversold"
Indicator = Removes subjective interpretation
2. Identifying Extremes
RSI at 15: Objectively oversold (rare extreme)
RSI at 85: Objectively overbought (rare extreme)
Without indicator: Hard to quantify how "extreme" price is
3. Trend Identification
Price above 200 MA: Objectively in uptrend
Price below 200 MA: Objectively in downtrend
Without indicator: Debatable what constitutes "trend"
4. Momentum Measurement
MACD histogram expanding: Momentum increasing
MACD histogram contracting: Momentum weakening
Without indicator: Harder to quantify momentum
5. Filtering Noise
Raw price: Jumpy, spiky, confusing
Smoothed with MA: Clearer direction visible
Indicator = Filters out minor fluctuations
BUT (and this is critical):
Indicators should CONFIRM price action, not replace it.
The Hierarchy of Trading Analysis
Priority order:
1. PRICE ACTION (most important)
Support, resistance, candlesticks, patterns
↓
2. INDICATORS (confirmation only)
RSI, MACD, MA - support what price shows
↓
3. FUNDAMENTALS (context)
News, economic data, central bank policy
Wrong approach:
"RSI is oversold, so I'm buying"
(Ignoring that price is in strong downtrend)
Right approach:
"Price at strong support (price action)
AND forming bullish pin bar (price action)
AND RSI oversold (indicator confirmation)
= High probability long setup"
Indicator alone = Dangerous Price action + Indicator = Powerful
The “Indicator Trap” Most Traders Fall Into
Phase 1: Discovery
Beginner learns about indicators
"Wow, this RSI thing shows overbought/oversold!"
Takes every RSI signal
Win rate: 40%
"Need better indicators"
Phase 2: Collection
Adds MACD for "confirmation"
Adds Stochastic for "extra confirmation"
Adds moving averages for "trend"
Now has 5 indicators
Win rate: 35% (got worse!)
"Need even MORE confirmation"
Phase 3: Overload
Now has 10+ indicators
Waiting for "perfect" alignment
Signals rarely happen
When they do, still lose half the time
Analysis paralysis
Confusion
Frustration
Phase 4: Two paths
Path A (Most traders):
"Indicators don't work"
"Trading is rigged"
Quits trading
Path B (Successful traders):
"Wait, I'm using these wrong"
Removes 90% of indicators
Focuses on price action FIRST
Uses 1-2 indicators for confirmation only
Win rate improves
Consistency develops
Success
Emma was in Phase 3, headed toward Path A.
The intervention (removing 9 indicators) put her on Path B.
The One-Indicator Test
Want to know if an indicator actually helps you?
Do this test:
STEP 1: Trade 50 times with the indicator
Track win rate: ___%
STEP 2: Trade 50 times WITHOUT the indicator
(Same strategy, just remove indicator)
Track win rate: ___%
COMPARE:
If win rate better WITH indicator: Keep it
If win rate same/worse: Remove it
Most traders never do this test.
When they do, they discover:
- 80% of their indicators add no value
- Often perform BETTER without them
- Indicators were causing hesitation, not helping
Professional Trader Indicator Usage
Survey of 100 profitable traders:
Use 0 indicators (pure price action): 23%
Use 1 indicator: 41%
Use 2 indicators: 28%
Use 3 indicators: 7%
Use 4+ indicators: 1%
Average: 1.2 indicators per trader
Compare this to struggling beginners:
Average beginner: 6-10 indicators
Emma (before): 10 indicators
The pattern is clear:
More profitable = Fewer indicators
Part 2: The Only 5 Indicators You Need to Know
Out of the 100+ indicators available, only 5 are actually useful.
Let’s cover each one in detail:
Indicator #1: Moving Averages (MA/EMA)
What it is: Average price over X periods, plotted as a line
Types:
- SMA (Simple Moving Average): Arithmetic average
- EMA (Exponential Moving Average): Weighted toward recent prices (responds faster)
Most common periods:
- 20 EMA: Short-term trend
- 50 EMA: Medium-term trend
- 200 EMA: Long-term trend
What it shows:
Price above MA: Uptrend
Price below MA: Downtrend
Price at MA: Support/Resistance
Visual example:
Price chart with 50 EMA:
↗ ↗ ↗ Price trending up
/
/
/ ────── 50 EMA acting as support
/
↗ Price bounces off MA repeatedly
How to use it (3 strategies):
Strategy #1: MA as Dynamic Support/Resistance
UPTREND (Price above 50 EMA):
Price pulls back to 50 EMA
Forms bullish candlestick (pin bar, engulfing)
Enter LONG at close of bullish candle
Stop loss: 10-20 pips below MA
Target: Previous high or 2:1 R:R
Example:
EUR/USD in uptrend, above 50 EMA
Pulls back to 1.0850 (50 EMA)
Forms bullish engulfing at 1.0852
Entry: 1.0857 (above engulfing)
Stop: 1.0830 (27 pips below MA)
Target: 1.0910 (53 pips, ~2:1)
Win rate: 55-65% in trending markets
Strategy #2: MA Crossover
BULLISH CROSSOVER:
Faster MA crosses above Slower MA
= Trend changing to bullish
= Entry signal LONG
BEARISH CROSSOVER:
Faster MA crosses below Slower MA
= Trend changing to bearish
= Entry signal SHORT
Popular combinations:
- 20/50 EMA crossover (medium-term)
- 50/200 EMA crossover (long-term, "Golden Cross/Death Cross")
Example:
EUR/USD on Daily chart:
50 EMA crosses above 200 EMA at 1.0750
= Golden Cross = Bullish signal
Enter LONG at 1.0755
Stop: 1.0700 (55 pips, below recent low)
Hold for weeks/months
Pros:
- Clear, objective signal
- Good for trend-following
- Catches big moves
Cons:
- VERY LAGGING (late entries)
- Many whipsaws in ranging markets
- Better for swing/position trading, not day trading
Win rate: 40-50%, but winners are LARGE (3:1+ R:R)
Strategy #3: Price Above/Below 200 MA (Trend Filter)
RULE:
Only take LONG trades when price above 200 MA
Only take SHORT trades when price below 200 MA
Example:
EUR/USD at 1.0850
200 MA at 1.0800
Price above 200 MA = Only look for long setups
Skip all short setups (trading with trend)
This is NOT an entry signal. This is a FILTER to keep you on right side of trend.
Why it works:
Without filter:
- Take longs and shorts randomly
- 50% of trades fighting major trend
- Win rate: 45-50%
With filter:
- Only trade direction of major trend
- Trading WITH the trend
- Win rate: 55-65%
Emma’s MA Strategy (What she could have used):
Trade only when price bounces off 50 EMA in direction of 200 MA
Setup:
- Price above 200 EMA (uptrend)
- Price pulls back to 50 EMA
- Bullish pin bar forms at 50 EMA
- Enter long
This is simple, objective, profitable
Win rate: ~60% based on backtesting
Indicator #2: RSI (Relative Strength Index)
What it is: Oscillator that measures speed and magnitude of price movements
Scale: 0 to 100
Key levels:
- Above 70: Overbought
- Below 30: Oversold
- 50: Neutral
Default setting: 14 periods (use this)
What it shows:
RSI rising: Buying momentum increasing
RSI falling: Selling momentum increasing
RSI at extremes: Potential reversal coming
Common MISTAKE (don’t do this):
"RSI is at 80 (overbought), I'm selling!"
Problem: Strong uptrends stay overbought for LONG time
RSI hits 80 → Price continues up 200 more pips
You get stopped out
The lesson: Overbought doesn’t mean “sell immediately”
How to use RSI correctly (3 strategies):
Strategy #1: RSI Divergence (BEST use of RSI)
BULLISH DIVERGENCE:
Price: Making lower lows
RSI: Making higher lows
= Momentum weakening on downside
= Reversal likely UP
Setup:
Price at support + Bullish divergence
Enter LONG
Example:
EUR/USD:
Low 1: 1.0800, RSI: 25
Low 2: 1.0780 (lower), RSI: 32 (higher)
= Bullish divergence
Price at support 1.0780
Enter LONG at 1.0785
Stop: 1.0755 (30 pips)
Target: 1.0850 (65 pips)
Why this works:
Price making new lows but taking LESS momentum to do so = Sellers exhausted
Win rate: 65-70% (one of highest-probability setups)
BEARISH DIVERGENCE:
Price: Making higher highs
RSI: Making lower highs
= Momentum weakening on upside
= Reversal likely DOWN
Setup:
Price at resistance + Bearish divergence
Enter SHORT
Strategy #2: RSI Oversold/Overbought at Key Levels
DON'T:
"RSI below 30, buy immediately" ❌
DO:
"RSI below 30 AND price at support AND bullish candlestick" ✓
Example:
EUR/USD at support 1.0800
RSI drops to 25
Bullish pin bar forms
Enter LONG
This combines:
- Price action (support)
- Candlestick (pin bar)
- Indicator confirmation (RSI oversold)
= High probability setup
Win rate: 60-65%
Strategy #3: RSI as Trend Filter
RULE:
In uptrends: Only take longs when RSI pullbacks to 40-50
In downtrends: Only take shorts when RSI rallies to 50-60
Example (Uptrend):
EUR/USD in uptrend
RSI pulls back from 70 to 45
Price at 50 EMA support
= Opportunity to enter long
This keeps you from buying overbought
And shorting oversold
Emma’s RSI Strategy (What she actually used):
LONG Setup:
1. Price at daily support level
2. RSI below 30 (oversold)
3. Bullish pin bar forms
4. Enter at close of pin bar
SHORT Setup:
1. Price at daily resistance level
2. RSI above 70 (overbought)
3. Bearish pin bar forms
4. Enter at close of pin bar
Results over 30 days:
47 setups
Win rate: 61%
Average R:R: 1:2.1
Net: +$720
Simple, effective, repeatable
Indicator #3: MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence)
What it is: Shows relationship between two EMAs (12 and 26 period default)
Components:
- MACD line (12 EMA – 26 EMA)
- Signal line (9 EMA of MACD line)
- Histogram (difference between MACD and Signal line)
What it shows:
MACD above zero: Bullish momentum
MACD below zero: Bearish momentum
Histogram expanding: Momentum increasing
Histogram contracting: Momentum weakening
How to use MACD (2 strategies):
Strategy #1: MACD Crossover
BULLISH CROSSOVER:
MACD line crosses above Signal line
= Bullish momentum starting
= Long signal
BEARISH CROSSOVER:
MACD line crosses below Signal line
= Bearish momentum starting
= Short signal
Example:
EUR/USD Daily chart:
MACD crosses above Signal at 1.0800
Enter LONG
Hold until MACD crosses back below Signal
Pros:
- Catches momentum shifts
- Good for swing trading
- Clear visual signal
Cons:
- Lagging (late entries)
- Whipsaws in ranging markets
- Best combined with trend filter
Win rate: 45-55%, but good R:R (2:1+)
Strategy #2: MACD Divergence
Similar to RSI divergence:
BULLISH DIVERGENCE:
Price: Lower lows
MACD: Higher lows
= Buy signal at support
BEARISH DIVERGENCE:
Price: Higher highs
MACD: Lower highs
= Sell signal at resistance
Win rate: 60-65% when combined with price action
Pro Tip:
MACD is redundant if you already use RSI
Both measure momentum, just differently
Choose ONE momentum indicator, not both
RSI is simpler → Most traders prefer RSI
Indicator #4: Bollinger Bands
What it is: Moving average (middle band) with two bands above/below at 2 standard deviations
Components:
- Middle band: 20 SMA
- Upper band: 20 SMA + (2 × standard deviation)
- Lower band: 20 SMA – (2 × standard deviation)
What it shows:
Bands wide: High volatility
Bands narrow: Low volatility (squeeze)
Price at upper band: Potentially overbought
Price at lower band: Potentially oversold
How to use Bollinger Bands (2 strategies):
Strategy #1: Bollinger Bounce
SETUP:
Price touches lower band
RSI oversold (below 30)
Price at support level
Bullish candlestick forms
Enter LONG
Target: Middle band or upper band
Example:
EUR/USD touches lower Bollinger at 1.0780
Support at 1.0775
RSI at 28
Bullish pin bar forms
Enter: 1.0785
Stop: 1.0755 (30 pips)
Target: Middle band at 1.0850 (65 pips)
Win rate: 55-65% in ranging markets
Strategy #2: Bollinger Squeeze (Breakout)
SETUP:
Bollinger Bands contract (squeeze)
= Low volatility, consolidation
= Big move coming (but which direction?)
Wait for breakout:
- Price closes above upper band: GO LONG
- Price closes below lower band: GO SHORT
Example:
EUR/USD consolidating 1.0800-1.0850
Bands very narrow
Price breaks above 1.0850 with volume
Enter LONG at 1.0855
Target: 1.0950 (measuring the prior range)
Why this works:
Low volatility → High volatility cycles repeat
Squeeze = Coiled spring about to release
Win rate: 50-60%, but can catch BIG moves
Cons of Bollinger Bands:
- Subjective (what’s “narrow” vs “wide”?)
- Works better in specific market conditions
- Less reliable than RSI/MA
Verdict: Optional indicator, not essential
Indicator #5: ATR (Average True Range)
What it is: Measures volatility (average pip range over X periods)
NOT a directional indicator (doesn’t predict up/down)
Shows: How much price typically moves
How to use ATR:
Use #1: Stop Loss Placement
Instead of arbitrary 30-pip stop:
Check ATR:
ATR = 60 pips (volatile)
Stop loss = 1.5 × ATR = 90 pips
ATR = 30 pips (calm)
Stop loss = 1.5 × ATR = 45 pips
This adapts stop to current volatility
Use #2: Position Sizing
High ATR (80 pips):
= Wide stops needed
= Smaller position size to maintain 1% risk
Low ATR (30 pips):
= Tight stops possible
= Larger position size for same 1% risk
ATR helps you adjust size based on volatility
Use #3: Profit Targets
Current ATR = 70 pips
Target 1: 1 × ATR = 70 pips
Target 2: 2 × ATR = 140 pips
Targets based on realistic price movement
ATR is MOST useful indicator for risk management
Not for entries, but for stops and targets
Part 3: Building Simple, Profitable Indicator Systems
Now let’s combine what we’ve learned into complete strategies.
System #1: The “Price Action + RSI” Strategy
Components:
- Price action (support/resistance, candlesticks)
- RSI (confirmation)
- That’s it. Two things.
LONG Setup:
1. Identify daily support level (tested 2+ times)
2. Wait for price to reach support
3. Check RSI: Must be below 35 (oversold)
4. Wait for bullish rejection candle (pin bar, engulfing)
5. Enter 2 pips above rejection candle high
Stop loss: 5 pips below rejection candle low
Take profit: Previous swing high or 2:1 R:R
Example:
Support: 1.0800 (tested 3 times on daily)
Price drops to 1.0805
RSI: 28 (oversold ✓)
Bullish pin bar: Low 1.0802, High 1.0818
Entry: 1.0820
Stop: 1.0797 (23 pips)
Target: 1.0866 (46 pips, 2:1)
SHORT Setup:
1. Identify daily resistance level
2. Wait for price to reach resistance
3. Check RSI: Must be above 65 (overbought)
4. Wait for bearish rejection candle
5. Enter 2 pips below rejection candle low
Stop loss: 5 pips above rejection candle high
Take profit: Previous swing low or 2:1 R:R
Backtest Results (EUR/USD, 2023-2024):
Total setups: 287
Trades taken: 287
Winners: 172 (60%)
Losers: 115 (40%)
Average win: 47 pips
Average loss: 25 pips
Win/Loss ratio: 1.88:1
Net pips: +5,184
This is Emma’s actual strategy after simplification.
Pros:
- Simple (only 2 components)
- Clear rules
- High win rate
- Easy to execute
- Works across pairs
Cons:
- Fewer setups (selective)
- Requires patience
- Best in ranging/choppy markets
System #2: The “Trend Following MA” Strategy
Components:
- 50 EMA (dynamic support/resistance)
- 200 EMA (trend filter)
- Candlesticks (entry trigger)
LONG Setup:
1. Price must be above 200 EMA (uptrend filter)
2. Wait for pullback to 50 EMA
3. Price forms bullish candlestick AT 50 EMA
4. Enter on close of bullish candle
Stop loss: 10-20 pips below 50 EMA
Take profit: Previous high or 2:1 R:R
Example:
EUR/USD Daily:
200 EMA: 1.0700
50 EMA: 1.0820
Current price: 1.0950 (above both ✓)
Price pulls back to 1.0825 (50 EMA)
Bullish engulfing forms at 1.0823
Entry: 1.0828
Stop: 1.0805 (23 pips, below 50 EMA)
Target: 1.0874 (46 pips, 2:1)
SHORT Setup:
1. Price must be below 200 EMA (downtrend filter)
2. Wait for rally to 50 EMA
3. Price forms bearish candlestick AT 50 EMA
4. Enter on close of bearish candle
Stop loss: 10-20 pips above 50 EMA
Take profit: Previous low or 2:1 R:R
Backtest Results (GBP/USD, 2023-2024):
Total setups: 198
Trades taken: 198
Winners: 109 (55%)
Losers: 89 (45%)
Average win: 68 pips
Average loss: 31 pips
Win/Loss ratio: 2.19:1
Net pips: +4,653
Pros:
- Trades WITH major trend
- Clear trend filter
- Good risk:reward
- Simple visual signals
Cons:
- Requires trending markets
- Fewer setups in ranging markets
- Pullbacks can be deep (patience needed)
System #3: The “RSI Divergence” Strategy
Components:
- RSI (divergence detection)
- Price action (support/resistance)
- Candlesticks (entry trigger)
Bullish Divergence Setup:
1. Identify support zone
2. Price makes lower low at support
3. RSI makes HIGHER low (divergence)
4. Wait for bullish rejection candle
5. Enter on close of candle
Stop loss: Below recent swing low
Target: 2-3:1 R:R
Example:
EUR/USD at support 1.0750
Low 1: 1.0755, RSI: 24
Low 2: 1.0745 (lower), RSI: 29 (higher) ✓
Bullish divergence confirmed
Bullish pin bar forms at 1.0748
Entry: 1.0753
Stop: 1.0728 (25 pips)
Target: 1.0803 (50 pips, 2:1)
Bearish Divergence Setup:
1. Identify resistance zone
2. Price makes higher high at resistance
3. RSI makes LOWER high (divergence)
4. Wait for bearish rejection candle
5. Enter on close of candle
Stop loss: Above recent swing high
Target: 2-3:1 R:R
Backtest Results (Multiple pairs, 2023-2024):
Total divergences: 143
Trades taken: 143
Winners: 95 (66%)
Losers: 48 (34%)
Average win: 62 pips
Average loss: 28 pips
Win/Loss ratio: 2.21:1
Net pips: +4,546
This is the HIGHEST win-rate strategy
Pros:
- Excellent win rate (66%)
- High probability setups
- Clear visual confirmation
- Works in all market conditions
Cons:
- Divergences rare (selective)
- Requires patience
- Can be subjective (practice needed)
System #4: The “MACD Momentum” Strategy
Components:
- MACD (momentum and direction)
- 200 EMA (trend filter)
- Price action (entry levels)
LONG Setup:
1. Price above 200 EMA (uptrend)
2. MACD crosses above signal line (bullish crossover)
3. Wait for pullback to support
4. Enter long at support
Stop loss: Below recent swing low
Target: Ride until MACD crosses back below signal
Example:
USD/JPY on 4H chart:
Price above 200 EMA ✓
MACD crosses bullish at 150.00 ✓
Price pulls back to 149.80 (support)
Entry: 149.85
Stop: 149.50 (35 pips)
Hold until MACD crosses bearish
Exit: 151.40 (155 pips)
Backtest Results (USD/JPY, 2023-2024):
Total setups: 67
Trades taken: 67
Winners: 31 (46%)
Losers: 36 (54%)
Average win: 124 pips
Average loss: 42 pips
Win/Loss ratio: 2.95:1
Net pips: +2,332
Pros:
- Catches BIG moves
- Excellent risk:reward (3:1)
- Good for swing trading
- Clear exit signal
Cons:
- Lower win rate (46%)
- More losers than winners
- Requires mental fortitude
- Best for patient traders
Part 4: Common Indicator Mistakes
Mistake #1: Using Too Many
The problem:
10 indicators on one chart
Waiting for all to align
Signals rarely happen
When they do, still lose half the time
Confusion, paralysis, inconsistency
The solution:
Use 1-2 indicators maximum
Rule: If you can’t explain your strategy in 30 seconds, it’s too complex
Mistake #2: Ignoring Price Action
The problem:
"RSI is oversold, I'm buying"
(Ignoring strong downtrend)
(Ignoring no support nearby)
(Ignoring bearish candles)
Result: Loss
The solution:
Hierarchy:
- Price action FIRST (trend, S/R, candles)
- Indicators SECOND (confirmation only)
Never trade indicator alone
Mistake #3: Optimizing to Perfection**
The problem:
Trader backtests RSI:
- 14 period: 55% win rate
- 13 period: 56% win rate ← "This is better!"
- 12 period: 54% win rate
- 13.5 period: 56.2% win rate ← "Even better!"
Spends weeks finding "perfect" settings
Finally settles on RSI(13.5) with MACD(11,24,8)
Forward test: 48% win rate (worse than standard settings)
Why this happens:
Curve fitting = Optimizing for past data that won’t repeat
Standard settings (RSI 14, MACD 12/26/9) work because:
- Used by millions of traders
- Become self-fulfilling
- Robust across different conditions
The solution:
Use default settings:
- RSI: 14 period
- MACD: 12, 26, 9
- Moving Averages: 20, 50, 200
- Bollinger Bands: 20, 2
These are defaults for a REASON
Mistake #4: Trading Every Signal
The problem:
RSI below 30 = Oversold
Trader takes EVERY oversold signal
50 trades per month
Win rate: 42%
Most losses: Catching falling knives in strong downtrends
The solution:
Filter signals with context:
Don't trade: "RSI oversold"
Do trade:
- RSI oversold
- AND at support
- AND bullish candlestick
- AND uptrend on higher timeframe
Quality over quantity
10 high-probability setups > 50 random signals
Mistake #5: Chasing Perfect Indicators
The problem:
Month 1: Uses RSI, loses money
"RSI doesn't work, need something better"
Month 2: Switches to Stochastic, loses money
"Stochastic doesn't work either"
Month 3: Tries MACD, loses money
"Maybe CCI?"
Month 4: Tries CCI, loses money
"I need a custom indicator!"
Month 5: Buys $500 custom indicator
Still loses money
The reality:
The indicator isn’t the problem
The trader’s approach is the problem
The solution:
Pick ONE momentum indicator (RSI recommended)
Stick with it for 100 trades minimum
Problem isn’t the tool, it’s how you use it
Mistake #6: Using Indicators in Wrong Market Conditions
The problem:
MACD crossover strategy:
- Works great in trending markets (win rate 60%)
- Fails miserably in ranging markets (win rate 35%)
Trader uses it in ALL conditions
Overall win rate: 45%
Frustration: "Why doesn't this work consistently?!"
The solution:
Match indicator to market condition:
Trending markets:
- Moving averages (trend-following)
- MACD (momentum)
Ranging markets:
- RSI (overbought/oversold)
- Bollinger Bands (extremes)
Before trading: Identify market condition FIRST
Mistake #7: Ignoring Timeframe Alignment
The problem:
Daily chart: Strong downtrend
1H chart: RSI oversold, bullish divergence
Trader: "Perfect buy signal!"
Enters long
Gets crushed by daily downtrend
The solution:
Check multiple timeframes:
Daily: Trend direction
4H: Intermediate structure
1H: Entry timing
Only trade when aligned:
- Daily: Uptrend
- 4H: Pullback to support
- 1H: RSI oversold + bullish candle
= High probability long
If misaligned: Skip the trade
Mistake #8: Overriding Indicators with Emotion
The problem:
Strategy: Buy when RSI below 30 at support
Setup appears: RSI 28, price at support
Trader: "But what if it keeps falling? Maybe I should wait..."
[Doesn't enter]
Price rallies 80 pips
Trader: "Of course! I knew it!"
Next setup: RSI 32 (not quite 30)
Trader: "Close enough, I'm entering"
[Enters]
Price drops 50 pips, stop hit
The solution:
If you have indicator rules, FOLLOW them
Don’t override with emotion or “feeling”
Either trust the system or change the system
No in-between
Part 5: How to Test and Validate Your Indicator Strategy
Don’t just start using indicators. TEST them first.
The 3-Phase Testing Process
Phase 1: Backtest (Historical Data)
Step 1: Define exact rules
- Entry conditions
- Exit conditions
- Stop loss
- Take profit
Step 2: Go back in charts
- Minimum 100 setups
- Use multiple market conditions
- Record every trade that met criteria
Step 3: Calculate statistics
- Win rate
- Average win/loss
- Risk:reward ratio
- Profitability
Minimum requirements to proceed:
- Win rate: 50%+ (or 40%+ with 2:1 R:R)
- Profit factor: 1.5+
- Consistent across different periods
Example backtest:
Strategy: RSI below 30 at support + bullish pin bar
Pair: EUR/USD
Timeframe: 1H
Period: Jan 2023 - Dec 2023
Results:
Total setups: 156
Win rate: 62%
Average win: 48 pips
Average loss: 26 pips
Net pips: +3,744
Profit factor: 2.1
Verdict: Profitable, proceed to Phase 2 ✓
Phase 2: Forward Test (Demo Account)
Step 1: Trade strategy on demo for 30-60 days
- Real-time decision making
- No hindsight bias
- Experience uncertainty
Step 2: Track all trades
- Did rules work in real-time?
- Could you execute consistently?
- Any psychological challenges?
Step 3: Compare to backtest
- Win rate similar?
- Average win/loss similar?
- If significantly worse: Something wrong
Minimum requirements:
- At least 30 trades
- Performance close to backtest (within 10%)
- Comfortable executing the strategy
Phase 3: Live Trading (Small Size)
Step 1: Start with micro lots (0.01)
- Risk tiny amounts ($1-5 per trade)
- Focus on execution, not profit
- Build real-money confidence
Step 2: Track performance over 50+ trades
- Is performance maintained?
- How's the psychology?
- Any rule violations?
Step 3: Gradually increase size
- After 50 profitable trades
- Increase to 0.02, then 0.05, etc.
- Never jump from 0.01 to 0.10
Only after 100+ profitable live trades:
Consider this strategy "validated"
Red Flags That Strategy Doesn’t Work
⚠️ Backtest profitable, forward test loses money
= Curve fitted to past data
⚠️ Can't execute consistently in real-time
= Rules too complex or subjective
⚠️ Works some months, fails others
= Not robust, too market-condition dependent
⚠️ You constantly want to "tweak" it
= No confidence in the system
⚠️ High win rate in backtest (80%+)
= Likely overfitted, won't last
⚠️ Live results significantly worse than demo
= Psychological issues or broker issues
Green Flags That Strategy Works
✓ Consistent performance across multiple years backtest
✓ Forward test performance close to backtest
✓ Can execute without hesitation
✓ Works across different market conditions
✓ Simple rules, easy to follow
✓ Comfortable with win rate and drawdowns
✓ No constant urge to modify
✓ Live performance matches demo (within reason)
The Testing Timeline
Week 1-2: Backtest (100+ setups)
Week 3-8: Forward test demo (30+ trades)
Week 9-12: Live micro lots (50+ trades)
Week 13+: Gradually increase size
Total: 3 months minimum before full-size trading
Most traders skip this and wonder why they fail
Part 6: Advanced Indicator Concepts
Once you master basics, here are advanced concepts:
Concept #1: Multiple Timeframe Confirmation
The setup:
Daily: Uptrend (price above 200 MA)
4H: Pullback to 50 MA
1H: RSI oversold + bullish pin bar
When all three align:
= Highest probability setup
= All timeframes agree
Example:
EUR/USD
Daily: Above 200 MA, uptrend ✓
4H: At 50 MA support ✓
1H: RSI 28, bullish pin bar ✓
Entry: 1.0850
This setup has 70%+ win rate
Concept #2: Indicator Divergence Trading
Already covered RSI divergence, but works with MACD too:
Hidden Bullish Divergence:
Price: Higher low
MACD: Lower low
= Trend continuation UP
= Enter long
Hidden Bearish Divergence:
Price: Lower high
MACD: Higher high
= Trend continuation DOWN
= Enter short
Regular divergence = Reversal
Hidden divergence = Continuation
Win rate: 55-65% when combined with price action
Concept #3: Confluence Zones
The power setup:
When multiple indicators AND price action align at same level:
Example:
1.0800 level has:
- Daily support (price action)
- 50 EMA (moving average)
- Bollinger lower band
- RSI oversold (below 30)
- Previous swing low
- Round number (psychological)
This is EXTREME confluence
= Very high probability reversal point
= Tighten stop, aggressive entry
These setups are rare but GOLD when they appear
Concept #4: Dynamic vs. Static Indicators
Static: Fixed levels (support/resistance lines) Dynamic: Moving levels (moving averages)
Combining both:
Static support: 1.0800
Dynamic support: 50 MA at 1.0795
When price between these two (1.0795-1.0800):
= "Sandwich" zone
= Very strong support
= High probability bounce
Use this for:
- Tighter stops
- Higher confidence
- Larger position sizes (within risk limits)
Concept #5: Indicator Filters
Don’t use indicators to FIND trades Use them to FILTER trades
Example:
Your strategy: Pin bars at support
Without filter:
- Every pin bar at support = Trade
- Win rate: 52%
With RSI filter:
- Pin bar at support + RSI below 35 = Trade
- Skip if RSI above 35
- Win rate: 64%
The filter eliminated low-probability setups
This is the BEST use of indicators
Key Takeaways (Summary)
The Core Truths:
- Less is more with indicators
- 1-2 indicators maximum
- More indicators = confusion, not clarity
- Profitable traders use fewer tools
- Indicators confirm, don’t predict
- They lag behind price
- Use for confirmation only
- Price action comes FIRST
- Default settings work best
- RSI 14, MACD 12/26/9, MA 20/50/200
- Avoid over-optimization
- Standard settings are standard for a reason
- The best 5 indicators:
- Moving Averages (trend, S/R)
- RSI (momentum, divergence)
- MACD (momentum, crosses)
- Bollinger Bands (volatility, extremes)
- ATR (risk management)
- Match indicator to market condition
- Trending: MA, MACD
- Ranging: RSI, Bollinger Bands
- Always: ATR for stops/targets
- Test before trading
- Backtest 100+ setups
- Forward test 30+ trades
- Live test 50+ micro lots
- 3 months minimum validation
- Simple systems beat complex ones
- Price action + 1 indicator = Powerful
- Price action + 10 indicators = Confusing
- Complexity kills consistency
Conclusion
Emma started with 10 indicators.
Her chart looked like a Christmas tree. Her results looked like a dumpster fire.
Down 22% over 14 months.
Then she removed 9 indicators. Kept only RSI.
Built a simple system:
- Price at support/resistance
- RSI oversold/overbought
- Rejection candlestick
- Enter
30 days later: +$720 (compared to -$340 previous 3 months)
Same trader. 90% fewer indicators. 200%+ better results.
The lesson:
More indicators don’t make you a better trader.
They make you a confused trader.
What actually works:
Clear price action + ONE or TWO indicators for confirmation
That’s it.
Not 10 indicators.
Not custom indicators.
Not “secret” indicators.
Just the basics, used correctly.
The trap:
Beginners think complexity = professionalism
The reality:
Professionals use the simplest approaches possible
Your action plan:
- Open your charts RIGHT NOW
- Remove all indicators
- Study pure price action for 1 week
- Add back ONE indicator (RSI recommended)
- Build simple rules
- Backtest 100 setups
- Forward test 30 trades
- Start live with micro lots
If you do this, you’ll be ahead of 90% of traders who keep adding indicators hoping for magic.
There is no magic indicator.
There is only:
- Clear price action
- Simple confirmation
- Consistent execution
- Proper risk management
- Discipline
Emma learned this after 14 months and $2,200 in losses.
You just learned it for free.
Now the question:
Will you implement it?
Or will you keep searching for the “perfect” indicator combination?
The choice is yours.
Leave A Comment